67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera vs Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3: which is safer?
Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3 is the clear pick. 67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleUnspecified optical coating composition
PossibleCoating degradation and particulate release
PossibleMetal frame leaching (aluminum or brass)
Our pick
Think Tank Photo
Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleUndisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry
PossibleCoating degradation over time
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Unspecified optical coating composition, Coating degradation and particulate release, Metal frame leaching (aluminum or brass) and Glass integrity and cutting risk on the and not on the Think Tank Photo.
- We flag Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry and Coating degradation over time on the Think Tank Photo and not on the .
- The is Glass lens, metal frame, unspecified optical coatings where the Think Tank Photo is Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Think Tank Photo is the one to buy.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases: see the full ranking