PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall34/ 100Poor
67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera

· Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

67mm Clip-on CPL Lens Filter Kit for Phone Camera

Good

Coating formula unclear and may contain PFAS. Pass for now.

Verdict · SkipGlass and metal construction poses minimal chemical hazard; unspecified optical coatings create unquantified PFAS uncertainty. Proceed with caution pending Samsung transparency.

This clip-on camera filter's optical coatings are a mystery. Teflon-family coating sometimes appear in such coatings, and the brand stays silent on PFAS.

The better-graded swap

OtterBox Defender Series Pro XT Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max

OtterBox

OtterBox Defender Series Pro XT Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Glass lens, metal frame, unspecified optical coatings

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🍳

Unspecified optical coating composition

Anti-reflective and polarizing coatings on glass lenses commonly use fluorinated or silicone-based formulations, but Samsung does not disclose specifics for this filter. Risk is primarily inhalation during manufacturing or potential leaching if coating degrades; consumer exposure during normal use is low unless filter is ingested or heavily worn.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and particulate release

Over years of use, optical coatings can flake or separate from substrate glass, especially if exposed to moisture, heat, or mechanical stress. Degraded coatings may release fine particles; inhalation risk is minimal in normal phone camera use but present if filter is disassembled or abraded.

70/ 100
🔩

Metal frame leaching (aluminum or brass)

If the frame is bare aluminum, prolonged contact with skin oils or moisture can promote surface corrosion and trace metal release. Brass frames may contain lead (though unlikely in regulated markets). Contact is typically minimal and indirect in this application, but prolonged skin contact should be avoided.

70/ 100
⚠️

Glass integrity and cutting risk

Dropped or damaged filters may shatter, creating sharp glass fragments. This is a mechanical hazard rather than chemical, but relevant for careful handling and storage, particularly in homes with children.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Bacterial growth in clip mechanism

No documented cases, but the clip housing may trap moisture and dust if not cleaned regularly. Risk is negligible for this specific product design.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This clip-on CPL (circular polarizing) filter consists of optical glass mounted in a metal frame (likely aluminum or brass). The critical unknown is the optical coating applied to the glass surfaces, anti-reflective and polarizing coatings often contain fluorinated compounds or other proprietary formulations that manufacturers rarely disclose. Glass itself is inert, but coatings are where chemical risk concentrates in optical products.

The brand's record and disclosure

Samsung has not publicly disclosed manufacturing details, material sourcing, or coating chemistry for this accessory line. The company's broader consumer electronics division has faced scrutiny over supply chain transparency but has not issued specific statements on optical filter safety. No independent certifications (RoHS, reach compliance statements) are documented for this specific product model.

How it compares in its category

Clip-on camera filters occupy a narrow, lightly regulated niche, optical coatings are rarely subject to the same disclosure requirements as food contact or textile products. Most competing brands (Neewer, K&F Concept, Hoya) similarly do not publicly specify coating composition. This product's risk profile is representative of the category, meaning the problem is structural opacity, not Samsung-specific failure.

If you buy it

Store the filter in a dry case to prevent moisture ingress into coating layers, which can degrade optical performance and potentially release coating materials. Clean only with microfiber cloths; avoid solvents or prolonged contact with skin oils. Do not expose to prolonged heat or direct sunlight storage, as thermal stress may compromise coating adhesion. Inspect annually for hazing, scratches, or discoloration, these signal coating degradation and warrant replacement.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Waterproof Camera & Lens Protection Cases

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Digital Holster 5 V3

Ballistic nylon, weather-sealed fabric, metal hardware

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
🏷️

Undisclosed water-repellent coating chemistry

Limited concern

70

Coating degradation over time

Limited concern

70

Camera holster with weather treatment; PFAS status undisclosed.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Nikon

WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera

Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Polycarbonate degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Nikon WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Nikon

WP-N1 Waterproof Housing

Polycarbonate housing with waterproof seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Gasket material degradation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Polycarbonate microcracking or crazing

Limited concern

70

No coating described, and no PFAS statement from the brand.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.