Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) Titanium LTE 64 GB Display vs Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz: which is safer?

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) Titanium LTE 64 GB Display is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) Titanium LTE 64 GB Display

Samsung

Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) Titanium LTE 64 GB Display

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Titanium case, AMOLED display

Confidence

35%

PossibleSeal degradation and water ingress

PossibleBand material allergens (dependent on strap type)

Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz

Swatch

Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Quartz crystal, stainless steel case, resin band

Confidence

78%

PossibleResin band VOC off-gassing

PossibleResin band degradation over time

PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel case

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Seal degradation and water ingress and Band material allergens (dependent on strap type) on the Samsung and not on the Swatch.
  • We flag Resin band VOC off-gassing, Resin band degradation over time and Nickel leaching from stainless steel case on the Swatch and not on the Samsung.
  • The Samsung is Titanium case, AMOLED display where the Swatch is Quartz crystal, stainless steel case, resin band, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Samsung grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof smartphone cases: see the full ranking