Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz vs Chrono 42 Quartz Watch: which is safer?
Swatch Chrono 42 Quartz Watch is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Swatch
Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Quartz crystal, stainless steel case, resin band
Confidence
78%
PossibleResin band VOC off-gassing
PossibleResin band degradation over time
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel case
Our pick
Swatch
Chrono 42 Quartz Watch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Stainless steel case, mineral/plastic crystal, standard watch components
Confidence
72%
PossibleMineral crystal breakage and laceration
PossibleBattery chemical leakage (internal only)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Resin band VOC off-gassing, Resin band degradation over time and Nickel leaching from stainless steel case on the Swatch and not on the Swatch.
- We flag Mineral crystal breakage and laceration and Battery chemical leakage (internal only) on the Swatch and not on the Swatch.
- The Swatch is Quartz crystal, stainless steel case, resin band where the Swatch is Stainless steel case, mineral/plastic crystal, standard watch components, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof smartphone cases: see the full ranking