Berry Global Inc and PFAS, what the company told Minnesota
Berry Global Inc has filed 4 PFAS disclosures with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, covering 4 products and naming 1 compound across 1 component. Everything below is the company’s own statement to a regulator, not our assessment.
- Disclosures filed
- 4
- Products covered
- 4
- Compounds named
- 1
- Declared uses
- 1
All 4 filings
- Where in the product,
- Venting membrane
- What it is doing,
- Other
- Compound,
- Fluoropolymers
- How much the filer reports,
- 100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)
SKU 2088555 · Minnesota disclosure MN-C1JPWFL · published 2026-09-29
- Where in the product,
- Venting membrane
- What it is doing,
- Other
- Compound,
- Fluoropolymers
- How much the filer reports,
- 100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)
SKU 2106628 · Minnesota disclosure MN-C1JPWFL · published 2026-09-29
- Where in the product,
- Venting membrane
- What it is doing,
- Other
- Compound,
- Fluoropolymers
- How much the filer reports,
- 100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)
SKU 2106634 · Minnesota disclosure MN-C1JPWFL · published 2026-09-29
- Where in the product,
- Venting membrane
- What it is doing,
- Other
- Compound,
- Fluoropolymers
- How much the filer reports,
- 100 ppm to <1,000 ppm (0.1%)
SKU 2106635 · Minnesota disclosure MN-C1JPWFL · published 2026-09-29
Other companies that have filed
- Franklin Electric9,127
- Logitech Inc.8,590
- Oriental Motor USA Corp4,047
- Infinite Electronics International, Inc.3,860
- Kaeser Compressors, Inc.3,655
- Global Life Sciences Solutions USA LLC2,694
- Bose Corporation2,017
- Electro-Voice Dynacord LLC1,982
- Vertiv Holdings Co.1,822
- IMI Plc. 1,755
- Amphenol CS1,586
- Hydro-Gear1,511
Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.