CoolIT Systems and PFAS, what the company told Minnesota

CoolIT Systems has filed 4 PFAS disclosures with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, covering 2 products and naming 2 distinct compounds across 2 components. 2 of those filings report the part is 90 to 100% PFAS by mass. Everything below is the company’s own statement to a regulator, not our assessment.

Disclosures filed
4
Products covered
2
Compounds named
2
Declared uses
2

How much is reported

Concentration bands as filed, heaviest declared first, with filings that give no concentration at the bottom. Counts are of filings, since one product can report more than one compound.

  • 90 to 100%2 filings
  • Present but the amount or concentration range is unknown2 filings

All 4 filings

CHx200CoolIT
Where in the product,
PTFE gaskets
What it is doing,
Monomers
Compound,
poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
How much the filer reports,
90 to 100%

part # 900-01511 · Minnesota disclosure MN-JB8R6OT · published 2026-09-12

CHx80CoolIT
Where in the product,
PTFE gaskets
What it is doing,
Monomers
Compound,
poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
How much the filer reports,
90 to 100%

part # 900-01508 · Minnesota disclosure MN-JB8R6OT · published 2026-09-12

CHx200CoolIT
Where in the product,
PCB components
What it is doing,
Flame retardant
Compound,
unkown
How much the filer reports,
Present but the amount or concentration range is unknown

part # 900-01511 · Minnesota disclosure MN-JB8R6OT · published 2026-09-12

CHx80CoolIT
Where in the product,
PCB components
What it is doing,
Flame retardant
Compound,
unkown
How much the filer reports,
Present but the amount or concentration range is unknown

part # 900-01508 · Minnesota disclosure MN-JB8R6OT · published 2026-09-12

Other companies that have filed

Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.