Ford Meter Box and PFAS, what the company told Minnesota

Ford Meter Box has filed 4 PFAS disclosures with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, covering 4 products and naming 1 compound across 3 components. 2 of those filings report the part is 90 to 100% PFAS by mass. Everything below is the company’s own statement to a regulator, not our assessment.

Disclosures filed
4
Products covered
4
Compounds named
1
Declared uses
1

How much is reported

Concentration bands as filed, heaviest declared first, with filings that give no concentration at the bottom. Counts are of filings, since one product can report more than one compound.

  • 90 to 100%2 filings
  • 10,000 ppm to <150,000 ppm (15%)2 filings

All 4 filings

Drain ValveFord
Where in the product,
Ball Valve Seat
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
Compound,
poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
How much the filer reports,
90 to 100%

SKU D · Minnesota disclosure MN-HAELZRC · published 2026-09-30

Stop and Waste ValveFord
Where in the product,
Ball Valve Seat
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
Compound,
poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
How much the filer reports,
90 to 100%

SKU SW · Minnesota disclosure MN-HAELZRC · published 2026-09-30

Ball ValveFord
Where in the product,
Ball Coating
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
Compound,
poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
How much the filer reports,
10,000 ppm to <150,000 ppm (15%)

SKU B · Minnesota disclosure MN-HAELZRC · published 2026-09-30

Quick Joint NutFord
Where in the product,
Nut Coating
What it is doing,
Anti-adhesive/cohesive
Compound,
poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
How much the filer reports,
10,000 ppm to <150,000 ppm (15%)

SKU Q · Minnesota disclosure MN-HAELZRC · published 2026-09-30

Other companies that have filed

Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.