Olympus Surgical Technologies America and PFAS, what the company told Minnesota

Olympus Surgical Technologies America has filed 3 PFAS disclosures with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, covering 2 products and naming 3 distinct compounds across 3 components. 1 of those filings report the part is 90 to 100% PFAS by mass. Everything below is the company’s own statement to a regulator, not our assessment.

Disclosures filed
3
Products covered
2
Compounds named
3
Declared uses
2

How much is reported

Concentration bands as filed, heaviest declared first, with filings that give no concentration at the bottom. Counts are of filings, since one product can report more than one compound.

  • 90 to 100%1 filing
  • 10,000 ppm to <150,000 ppm (15%)2 filings

All 3 filings

XF020 - DURAGLIDE DRY LUBRICANT (2% PTFE SOLIDS)Microcare
Where in the product,
Cleaning Aids Accessories - Target Use/Application - All Purpose
What it is doing,
Solvent
Compound,
1,1,1,2,2,3,4,5,5,5-decafluoropentane (CAS 138495-42-8)
How much the filer reports,
90 to 100%

SKU MCC-XF020 · Minnesota disclosure MN-8FDNZNC · published 2026-02-19

Novec Engineered Fluid 72DA3M
Where in the product,
Surface Cleaners - Type Of Surface Cleaners - Degreaser
What it is doing,
Solvent
How much the filer reports,
10,000 ppm to <150,000 ppm (15%)

SKU 72DA · Minnesota disclosure MN-8FDNZNC · published 2026-02-19

XF020 - DURAGLIDE DRY LUBRICANT (2% PTFE SOLIDS)Microcare
Where in the product,
Lubricating Greases - Type Of Lubricant Application - Teflon Based
What it is doing,
Lubricating agent
How much the filer reports,
10,000 ppm to <150,000 ppm (15%)

SKU MCC-XF020 · Minnesota disclosure MN-8FDNZNC · published 2026-02-19

Other companies that have filed

Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.