Pressure transfer agent, as a declared use for PFAS
1 company has told Minnesota that they put PFAS into products to serve this purpose, in 5 filings covering 3 products and 1 distinct compounds. This is the field that makes the set worth reading, because it records PFAS being chosen for a job rather than turning up as a contaminant.
- Disclosures
- 5
- Companies
- 1
- Products
- 3
- Compounds used
- 1
All 5 filings
- Where in the product,
- Rod Seal Back Up Ring
- What it is doing,
- Pressure transfer agent
- Compound,
- poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
- How much the filer reports,
- 300,000 to <600,000 ppm (60%)
IMI Product Code HH Series · Minnesota disclosure MN-T5J9Q16 · published 2026-09-30
- Where in the product,
- O-ring Back Up Ring
- What it is doing,
- Pressure transfer agent
- Compound,
- poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
- How much the filer reports,
- 300,000 to <600,000 ppm (60%)
IMI Product Code HH Series · Minnesota disclosure MN-T5J9Q16 · published 2026-09-30
- Where in the product,
- Teflon Wearband
- What it is doing,
- Pressure transfer agent
- Compound,
- poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
- How much the filer reports,
- 300,000 to <600,000 ppm (60%)
IMI Product Code HH Series · Minnesota disclosure MN-T5J9Q16 · published 2026-09-30
- Where in the product,
- Teflon Wearband
- What it is doing,
- Pressure transfer agent
- Compound,
- poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
- How much the filer reports,
- 300,000 to <600,000 ppm (60%)
IMI Product Code TA Series · Minnesota disclosure MN-T5J9Q16 · published 2026-09-30
- Where in the product,
- Teflon Wearband
- What it is doing,
- Pressure transfer agent
- Compound,
- poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) (CAS 9002-84-0)
- How much the filer reports,
- 300,000 to <600,000 ppm (60%)
IMI Product Code TAS Series · Minnesota disclosure MN-T5J9Q16 · published 2026-09-30
Other declared uses
Source, manufacturer filings made to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency under the state’s PFAS in Products law and published through PRISM, run by the Interstate Chemicals Clearinghouse. These are the manufacturers’ own statements, not our grades and not laboratory results. A filing covers the product as sold in Minnesota and says nothing about products or formulations the company did not file. Reporting was still open when this was pulled, so absence from the set is not evidence a product is PFAS-free.