PFAS65/ 100Good
Overall47/ 100Poor
New Balance Men's Moisture Wicking Lightweight Breathable Boxer Briefs

New Balance · Sports Performance Undergarments

New Balance Men's Moisture Wicking Lightweight Breathable Boxer Briefs

Good

Boxer briefs lack typical water-repellent coating finishes where PFAS occurs.

Verdict · SkipPolyester/nylon blend with moisture-wicking finish poses minimal established risks; no brand safety controversies on record; standard apparel hazards are low-concern for this garment type.

Moisture-wicking textiles don't require PFAS treatments like waterproof apparel. Synthetic blends in basic underwear carry minimal risk versus untreated cotton.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester/nylon blend with moisture-wicking finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

The black, navy, or colored variants may use azo dyes or pigments that could contain trace heavy metals (cadmium, lead). Established public records do not show specific testing failures for New Balance boxer briefs, but colorfast synthetic textiles routinely contain low levels of such dyes; migration to skin is considered minimal under normal conditions.

Source, FDA
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester commonly contains antimony trioxide as a catalyst residue from manufacturing. Residual antimony in finished textiles is typically below 50 ppm and is not considered a significant dermal hazard during normal wear. No recall or clinical evidence of harm from antimony migration in athletic underwear is on record.

70/ 100

Degradation of applied moisture-wicking finish over repeated washing

Polyurethane or silicone-based moisture-wicking coatings degrade gradually with heat and mechanical stress. After 50-100+ wash cycles, the hydrophilic finish can thin or flake; this is normal wear, not a safety hazard, but signals replacement timing to maintain performance.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based durable-press or wrinkle-resist finishes are typical in moisture-wicking athletic wear. This product is unlikely to contain formaldehyde resins used in dress shirts or permanent-press apparel.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Moisture-wicking boxer briefs are not subject to flame-resistance regulations (those apply mainly to sleepwear for children). No additive flame retardants are reported in this product category.

Source, EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This product is a polyester/nylon blend with an applied moisture-wicking finish. Polyester is a synthetic polymer stable under normal wear conditions; nylon adds elasticity and durability. The moisture-wicking treatment is typically a hydrophilic chemical coating (often polyurethane-based or silicone-derived) that channels sweat away from skin. This blend combination is one of the most common in performance athletic wear and has a long track record of predictable performance with minimal off-gassing or leaching under typical use.

The brand's record and disclosure

New Balance has not publicly disclosed comprehensive chemical hazard testing or supply-chain certifications for apparel lines, and the brand maintains silence on PFAS use in textiles. However, New Balance has no documented recalls or safety violations specific to boxer briefs or moisture-wicking underwear. The brand is a mainstream athletic manufacturer with standard regulatory compliance but does not lead in transparency reporting compared to some competitors.

How it compares in its category

Performance boxer briefs are a commodity segment. New Balance's offering sits in the mid-market tier, it avoids some premium certifications (GOTS, Oeko-Tex) that competitors market, but also lacks the cost-cutting corner-cutting of budget brands. Most moisture-wicking performance underwear in this category relies on similar polyester/nylon blends and applied finish treatments; New Balance's formulation is typical and does not stand out as higher or lower risk than comparable athletic brands.

If you buy it

Wash in cool to warm water (below 60C/140F) and air-dry or tumble dry low to preserve the moisture-wicking finish; hot water and high heat can degrade applied coatings over time. Replace after 50-100 washes or if elastic fails, waistband sags, or moisture-wicking performance noticeably declines. No special detergents are required; standard laundry soap works fine. Avoid chlorine bleach and fabric softeners, which can interfere with hydrophilic treatments.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
New Balance has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More sports performance undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.