PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall3/ 100Bad
Pit Boss Butcher Paper Roll 67294

Pit Boss · Grease-Resistant Deli & Butcher Paper

Pit Boss Butcher Paper Roll 67294

Poor

Likely grease-resistant coated; PFAS status unclear without disclosure.

Verdict · SkipButcher paper's grease-resistant coating likely contains PFAS; non-PFAS hazards minimal if used as intended. Brand transparency absent. Acceptable for short-contact food wrapping with caution.

Pit Boss butcher paper is designed for grease resistance, which typically requires fluorinated coatings. The brand provides no PFAS disclosure or testing information.

The better-graded swap

If You Care Parchment Baking Sheets

If You Care

If You Care Parchment Baking Sheets

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Paper with water/grease-resistant coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Butcher paper's water/grease resistance almost certainly relies on fluorochemical treatment typical to the category. Migration into fatty meats and smoking condensates is plausible under extended contact or high-heat use.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and particle release

Repeated folding, high heat exposure, or contact with acidic marinades may degrade the coating, risking fine particles in food. No data on Pit Boss 67294 durability specifics; risk is material-class consistent.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🫧

Microplastics

Cellulose paper itself does not shed microplastics. Coating particles under severe thermal stress are theoretically possible but not documented for butcher paper in normal use.

Source, EPA
95/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Butcher paper is not a source of BPA or phthalate plasticizers; these are associated with plastic-based food wraps, not paper coatings.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Ink or print contaminants (if printed)

Pit Boss 67294 is unprinted kraft paper. No heavy metals or soy-ink concerns apply to blank butcher paper rolls.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Pit Boss Butcher Paper 67294 is cellulose paper treated with a water and grease-resistant coating to withstand meat juices and smoking environments. The coating chemistry is not disclosed by the brand, but industry standard for butcher paper involves fluorochemical (PFAS) or silicone-based barriers. The paper substrate itself is inert; the coating's composition determines whether migration into food or environmental release becomes a concern during storage and cooking.

The brand's record and disclosure

Parchment Plus and parent Pit Boss do not publicly disclose coating chemistry or PFAS presence on product labeling or safety documentation. No third-party certifications (e.g., FDA migration testing, GOTS, or fluorochemical-free claims) appear on record for this product. The brand's silence on PFAS aligns with industry-wide reluctance to communicate coating details, making independent verification difficult.

How it compares in its category

Most commercial butcher paper relies on fluorochemical coatings for durability in high-moisture smoking and grilling. PFAS-free butcher paper alternatives (marketed by niche brands) exist but command 20-40% price premiums and are harder to source. Pit Boss's pricing and wide availability suggest conventional fluorochemical coating, typical for mass-market butcher paper rolls.

If you buy it

Use for direct contact with uncooked or warm (not boiling) meat; limit direct flame exposure to prevent coating degradation. Paper fibers themselves are food-safe; the risk is coating migration under prolonged high heat or grease saturation. Replace if visible tears, discoloration, or coating peeling occur. Store in cool, dry conditions; do not use for baking above 250F or prolonged hot-water contact.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Pit Boss has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Grease-Resistant Deli & Butcher Paper

Idl Packaging White Butcher Paper 18" x Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish

IDL Packaging

White Butcher Paper 18" x Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish

bleached paper, uncoated

PFAS Grade95Excellent
Overall Grade91Excellent
⚠️

Mold or microbial growth during storage

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Starting grade for this product type

Idl Packaging White Butcher Paper 18" x 12000" Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish

IDL Packaging

White Butcher Paper 18" x 12000" Natural Butcher Paper Roll for Meat and Fish

bleached kraft paper, no specified coating

PFAS Grade95Excellent
Overall Grade87Excellent
⚠️

Ink or printing residue (if printed side contacts food)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mold or microbial growth during storage

Limited concern

70

Brand PFAS statement on record, which we have not verified.

Starting grade for this product type

If You Care Parchment Baking Sheets

If You Care

Parchment Baking Sheets

unbleached parchment paper, silicone coating

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent

Silicone coating degradation under heat stress

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mold or microbial growth if stored damp

Limited concern

70

Brand no-added-PFAS claim and a 2021 lab result with no fluorine detected.

Lab test found no PFAS

More grease-resistant deli & butcher paper grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.