20Bad

Rip Stop by WeatherWear Review, Is Rip Stop by WeatherWear Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 2 graded products, Rip Stop by WeatherWear averages Bad (20/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Carhartt Women's Ripstop Apron

Rip Stop by WeatherWear

Carhartt Women's Ripstop Apron

Cotton/polyester ripstop with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

PFAS Grade20Bad
Overall Grade12Bad
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are used in fabric finishing for wrinkle resistance and…

70
🫧

Coating degradation and microfiber shedding

As the water-repellent coating ages and washes wear it away, ripstop fabric may shed…

70

Ripstop apron carries typical water-repellent coating risk; brand offers no PFAS clarity.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Ripstop Apron

Rip Stop by WeatherWear

Ripstop Apron

Ripstop nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment

PFAS Grade20Bad
Overall Grade12Bad
🍳

water-repellent coating (fluorinated or paraffin) leachability

Ripstop apron's water-repellent finish may contain PFAS or other persistent coating…

70
🫧

Coating degradation and microfiber shed

Over time, repeated washing and wear may cause the water-repellent coating to peel or…

70

Ripstop aprons commonly use water-repellent coating coatings that may contain legacy PFAS.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →