PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Carhartt Women's Ripstop Apron

Rip Stop by WeatherWear · Work Aprons

Carhartt Women's Ripstop Apron

Bad

Ripstop apron carries typical water-repellent coating risk; brand offers no PFAS clarity.

Verdict: SkipRipstop apron is functional work gear with typical water-repellent coating/PFAS risk and silent brand disclosure; safe for intended use with basic maintenance.

This Carhartt ripstop apron relies on water-repellent coating to achieve durability, a treatment historically built on PFAS. Carhartt/WeatherWear says nothing about PFAS avoidance.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Cotton/polyester ripstop with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are used in fabric finishing for wrinkle resistance and durability. This apron's ripstop construction and water-repellent coating finish may involve such chemistry. No independent testing data is publicly available; levels in finished garments are typically low and off-gas primarily during manufacturing, not consumer use.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microfiber shedding

As the water-repellent coating ages and washes wear it away, ripstop fabric may shed microfiber particles, particularly polyester fibers. This is common to all synthetic-blend workwear and is not unique to this product. Washing in a mesh bag or delicate cycle reduces shedding.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes

No substantiated reports of banned azo dyes in Carhartt or WeatherWear ripstop aprons. Cotton/polyester blends in industrial workwear are typically colored with compliant disperse dyes, though no third-party certification confirms this for this specific product.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Antimony is used as a catalyst in polyester fiber production but is rarely detected in finished garments at consumer-unsafe levels. No recalls or alerts exist for Carhartt or WeatherWear aprons. Standard polyester used in workwear does not pose a known skin or ingestion risk under normal wear.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Lead, cadmium, and chromium are regulated in textile dyes in the EU and most US suppliers; no substantiated detections in mainstream Carhartt-adjacent aprons. No third-party testing for this specific product is publicly available.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This apron is cotton/polyester ripstop, a durable blended fabric designed to resist tearing and water penetration. The water-repellent finish is almost certainly a fluorochemical coating (water-repellent coating) applied during manufacturing to achieve that moisture barrier. Ripstop construction itself is benign, but the water-repellent coating finishing chemistry is the primary non-PFAS concern in work aprons of this type. Normal use does not expose you to the coating directly, but durability and eventual degradation matter over the product's life.

The brand's record and disclosure

Rip Stop by WeatherWear has no publicly available certifications (Bluesign, GOTS, OEKO-TEX, or similar) and does not disclose water-repellent coating formulation, PFAS status, or chemical sourcing. No major product recalls or safety controversies are on record for this brand. The silence on PFAS is typical for mainstream workwear brands that have not committed to fluorine-free water-repellent coating alternatives; it reflects industry norm rather than particular negligence.

How it compares in its category

Work aprons in this price and durability range almost universally use fluorochemical water-repellent coating finishes. Carhartt and similar mainstream brands rarely disclose PFAS content or commit to alternatives. Premium alternatives exist (brands using fluorine-free repellent systems), but they command higher prices. This apron sits in the middle of the market: more durable than budget cotton aprons, but without the transparency of certified sustainable workwear lines.

If you buy it

Wash separately from other clothing if possible, or in a delicate cycle with cold water to extend the water-repellent coating. Do not machine dry on high heat, as this can damage polyester fibers and potentially degrade the coating prematurely. The apron is not designed for or exposed to food contact or skin-sensitive areas in normal work use, so dermal exposure is minimal. Replace when the fabric begins tearing or pilling, not solely on repellency loss; typical lifespan is 2-3 years with regular use.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Rip Stop by WeatherWear has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Work Aprons

Dickies 2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078

Dickies

2-Pocket Canvas Apron 57078

100% canvas cotton, uncoated

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower risk from plain canvas apron with no performance finishes.

Risky category by default

Dickies Toolmaker's Apron

Dickies

Toolmaker's Apron

Cotton duck fabric

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower risk from traditional cotton apron, though no lab confirmation exists.

Risky category by default

Duluth Trading Company Plus Heirloom Gardening Apron Smock

Duluth Trading

Company Plus Heirloom Gardening Apron Smock

Cotton canvas apron, no waterproof or stain-resistant coating disclosed

PFAS Grade65Good
Good

Lower risk from plain canvas apron with no water or stain treatment.

Risky category by default

More work aprons grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.