Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts vs Men's Outdoor Everyday Shorts: which is safer?

adidas Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

adidas Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts

Adidas

Men's Workout Essentials Base Woven Shorts

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Poor 47/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Woven polyester/nylon blend, no waterproof or stain-resistant treatment specified

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and heavy metal colorants

ReportedMicrofiber shedding from synthetic blend

PossibleFormaldehyde resins in finishing

Patagonia Men's Outdoor Everyday Shorts

Patagonia

Men's Outdoor Everyday Shorts

PFAS grade

Poor 45/100

Overall grade

Poor 27/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon/polyester blend with water-repellent coating treatment

Confidence

72%

PossibleAntimony in polyester

PossibleSynthetic water-repellent coating leaching or off-gassing

ReportedMicroplastic shedding from synthetic fibers

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and heavy metal colorants, Microfiber shedding from synthetic blend and Formaldehyde resins in finishing on the Adidas and not on the Patagonia.
  • We flag Antimony in polyester, Synthetic DWR coating leaching or off-gassing and Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers on the Patagonia and not on the Adidas.
  • The Adidas is Woven polyester/nylon blend, no waterproof or stain-resistant treatment specified where the Patagonia is nylon/polyester blend with DWR treatment, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof sports gear, see the full ranking