Is there PFAS in your tap water?
The EPA's national survey found PFAS above the 4 parts per trillion federal limit in 1,711 of the 10,313 public water systems it tested, and detected PFAS at any level in 3,595 of them.
Under the fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule the EPA required almost every public water system in the country to test for 29 PFAS compounds and published every result. These pages are those results, system by system, with what each reading means against the federal limit and which filters remove it.
Find your state
| State | Systems tested | With a detection | Above the limit |
|---|---|---|---|
| California | 707 | 239 | 166 |
| Florida | 409 | 195 | 160 |
| New Jersey | 266 | 174 | 155 |
| Pennsylvania | 390 | 176 | 117 |
| North Carolina | 291 | 146 | 116 |
| Massachusetts | 263 | 144 | 106 |
| Texas | 1154 | 622 | 101 |
| Alabama | 307 | 117 | 81 |
| South Carolina | 165 | 91 | 66 |
| Ohio | 347 | 142 | 59 |
| New York | 334 | 100 | 50 |
| Georgia | 256 | 81 | 43 |
| Tennessee | 277 | 87 | 37 |
| Connecticut | 63 | 40 | 35 |
| Washington | 248 | 68 | 34 |
| Kentucky | 231 | 87 | 30 |
| Puerto Rico | 99 | 39 | 28 |
| Illinois | 487 | 128 | 27 |
| Arizona | 152 | 57 | 24 |
| Wisconsin | 202 | 52 | 21 |
| West Virginia | 103 | 34 | 21 |
| Virginia | 171 | 54 | 20 |
| Indiana | 230 | 55 | 19 |
| Minnesota | 196 | 88 | 16 |
| Maryland | 83 | 30 | 16 |
| New Hampshire | 51 | 18 | 16 |
| Delaware | 36 | 17 | 14 |
| Oklahoma | 166 | 68 | 13 |
| Colorado | 165 | 39 | 13 |
| Oregon | 127 | 18 | 11 |
| Rhode Island | 29 | 15 | 11 |
| Missouri | 232 | 73 | 9 |
| Michigan | 319 | 44 | 7 |
| Louisiana | 268 | 48 | 7 |
| Mississippi | 239 | 9 | 7 |
| Iowa | 152 | 32 | 7 |
| Kansas | 103 | 35 | 6 |
| Maine | 41 | 10 | 5 |
| New Mexico | 73 | 11 | 4 |
| Nebraska | 53 | 7 | 4 |
| Alaska | 30 | 9 | 4 |
| Utah | 129 | 16 | 3 |
| Idaho | 61 | 9 | 3 |
| Nevada | 59 | 10 | 3 |
| South Dakota | 49 | 7 | 2 |
| Montana | 45 | 5 | 2 |
| Arkansas | 172 | 10 | 1 |
| Vermont | 38 | 3 | 1 |
| Wyoming | 33 | 3 | 1 |
| Guam | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| the U.S. Virgin Islands | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| the Northern Mariana Islands | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Hawaii | 45 | 2 | 0 |
| North Dakota | 38 | 7 | 0 |
| the Navajo Nation | 13 | 2 | 0 |
| District of Columbia | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| American Samoa | 1 | 1 | 0 |
What to do about it
Boiling does not remove PFAS, it concentrates it. Reverse osmosis and certified activated carbon do. We grade water filters 0 to 100 on the chemistry of the filter itself, which is a separate question from how well it filters, and both matter.
Graded water filters you can buy today
The best graded product in each filter type we cover.
- AquaTru AquaTru Under Sink Under SinkExcellent 100/100Check price
- Watts Water Technologies Watts BB-S101 Whole Home SystemExcellent 95/100Check price
- VOSS VOSS stillExcellent 100/100Check price
- LARQ LARQ PitcherExcellent 100/100Check price
We may earn a commission on these links, at no cost to you. It never changes a grade.
Source, the EPA’s fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule, final dataset published 2026-10-15. Original data → Free to cite with attribution and a link. Lithium is in the same survey and is not a PFAS; it is excluded everywhere here.