Air Flow Underpads 4 Pack / 40 vs Incontinence Pads: which is safer?

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads is the clear pick. TENA Air Flow Underpads 4 Pack / 40 carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

TENA Air Flow Underpads 4 Pack / 40

Tena

Air Flow Underpads 4 Pack / 40

PFAS grade

Poor 25/100

Overall grade

Bad 0/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Absorbent core, synthetic polymer backing with waterproof layer

Confidence

42%

LikelyPFAS in waterproof backing layer

PossibleBacterial colonization and odor from moisture retention

PossibleSkin sensitization or irritation from coating or additives

Our pick

Eco by Naty Incontinence Pads

Eco By Naty

Incontinence Pads

PFAS grade

Good 70/100

Overall grade

Good 66/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 1

Material

Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core

Confidence

78%

PossibleHeavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS in waterproof backing layer, Bacterial colonization and odor from moisture retention and Skin sensitization or irritation from coating or additives on the Tena and not on the Eco By Naty.
  • We flag Heavy metals in cellulose or plant-derived materials on the Eco By Naty and not on the Tena.
  • The Tena is Absorbent core, synthetic polymer backing with waterproof layer where the Eco By Naty is Bamboo-derived viscose, cotton, plant-based absorbent core, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Eco By Naty is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Tena grade, at 42% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More incontinence pads & protection: see the full ranking