Balance 2 XT Smartwatch vs Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz: which is safer?
Amazfit Balance 2 XT Smartwatch is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Amazfit
Balance 2 XT Smartwatch
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 81/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel case, glass face, plastic/elastomer band
Confidence
35%
PossibleElastomer band degradation and microbial colonization
Swatch
Omega X Swatch Mission To Moon Quartz
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Quartz crystal, stainless steel case, resin band
Confidence
78%
PossibleResin band VOC off-gassing
PossibleResin band degradation over time
PossibleNickel leaching from stainless steel case
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Elastomer band degradation and microbial colonization on the Amazfit and not on the Swatch.
- We flag Resin band VOC off-gassing, Resin band degradation over time and Nickel leaching from stainless steel case on the Swatch and not on the Amazfit.
- The Amazfit is Stainless steel case, glass face, plastic/elastomer band where the Swatch is Quartz crystal, stainless steel case, resin band, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Amazfit grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof smartphone cases, see the full ranking