MagGo Magnetic Case with Stand vs Protector Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max MagSafe: which is safer?

These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.

Anker MagGo Magnetic Case with Stand

Anker

MagGo Magnetic Case with Stand

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

TPU plastic shell, fabric/synthetic lining

Confidence

72%

PossibleTPU plasticizer leaching

PossibleVOC off-gassing

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from wear

Pelican Protector Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max MagSafe

Pelican

Protector Case for iPhone 17 Pro Max MagSafe

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Rugged polymer case, likely polycarbonate or TPE blend

Confidence

45%

PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing

PossibleDegradation or micro-cracking of polymer structure

PossibleGasket material decomposition or mold growth

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag TPU plasticizer leaching, VOC off-gassing and Microplastic shedding from wear on the Anker and not on the Pelican.
  • We flag Volatile organic compounds (VOC) off-gassing, Degradation or micro-cracking of polymer structure and Gasket material decomposition or mold growth on the Pelican and not on the Anker.
  • The Anker is TPU plastic shell, fabric/synthetic lining where the Pelican is Rugged polymer case, likely polycarbonate or TPE blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the Pelican grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof phone cases: see the full ranking