MagGo Magnetic Case with Stand vs Spigen Rugged Armor iPhone 13 Matte Case: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Anker
MagGo Magnetic Case with Stand
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
TPU plastic shell, fabric/synthetic lining
Confidence
72%
PossibleTPU plasticizer leaching
PossibleVOC off-gassing
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from wear
Rugged Armor
Spigen Rugged Armor iPhone 13 Matte Case
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) and polycarbonate blend
Confidence
72%
PossibleVolatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polymer off-gassing
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use
PossiblePolymer degradation and leachate formation
Where these two actually differ
- We flag TPU plasticizer leaching, VOC off-gassing and Microplastic shedding from wear on the Anker and not on the Rugged Armor.
- We flag Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polymer off-gassing, Microplastic shedding during use and Polymer degradation and leachate formation on the Rugged Armor and not on the Anker.
- The Anker is TPU plastic shell, fabric/synthetic lining where the Rugged Armor is TPU (thermoplastic polyurethane) and polycarbonate blend, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof phone cases: see the full ranking