Monofilament vs Legalis LT Spinning Reel: which is safer?
Ande Monofilament is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Ande
Monofilament
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 81/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Confidence
72%
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use
Daiwa
Legalis LT Spinning Reel
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Metal gears, bearings, aluminum spool, stainless steel bail
Confidence
78%
PossibleAluminum corrosion and metal oxidation
PossibleBearing seizing or rust if poorly maintained
PossibleSharp edges or pinch points
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastic shedding during use on the Ande and not on the Daiwa.
- We flag Aluminum corrosion and metal oxidation, Bearing seizing or rust if poorly maintained and Sharp edges or pinch points on the Daiwa and not on the Ande.
- The Ande is Monofilament nylon fishing line where the Daiwa is Metal gears, bearings, aluminum spool, stainless steel bail, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More fishing line, see the full ranking