Monofilament vs Ultragreen Line: which is safer?
Ande Monofilament is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Ande
Monofilament
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 81/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Confidence
72%
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use
Maxima
Ultragreen Line
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy with care
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Fishing line, likely nylon or copolymer
Confidence
25%
PossibleNylon degradation and microparticle release
PossiblePFAS in fluorocarbon or coatings (if present)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastic shedding during use on the Ande and not on the Maxima.
- We flag Nylon degradation and microparticle release and PFAS in fluorocarbon or coatings (if present) on the Maxima and not on the Ande.
- The Ande is Monofilament nylon fishing line where the Maxima is Fishing line, likely nylon or copolymer, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Maxima grade, at 25% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More fishing line, see the full ranking