Monofilament vs Automatic Fly Reel: which is safer?
Ande Monofilament is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Ande
Monofilament
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 81/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Monofilament nylon fishing line
Confidence
72%
PossibleMicroplastic shedding during use
Pflueger
Automatic Fly Reel
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Aluminum spool, brass/stainless internals, standard mechanical components
Confidence
72%
PossibleAluminum corrosion and oxidation products
PossibleBrass dezincification in acidic or chlorinated water
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastic shedding during use on the Ande and not on the Pflueger.
- We flag Aluminum corrosion and oxidation products and Brass dezincification in acidic or chlorinated water on the Pflueger and not on the Ande.
- The Ande is Monofilament nylon fishing line where the Pflueger is Aluminum spool, brass/stainless internals, standard mechanical components, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More fishing line, see the full ranking