4-Pack New Nylon USB C to USB C Cable (3.3 ft 60W) vs USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack: which is safer?

4-Pack New Nylon USB C to USB C Cable (3.3 ft 60W) is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

4-Pack New Nylon USB C to USB C Cable (3.3 ft 60W)

Anker

4-Pack New Nylon USB C to USB C Cable (3.3 ft 60W)

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Nylon cable with standard connectors

Confidence

72%

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from nylon jacket degradation

PossibleElectrical safety from insulation breakdown

Anker USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack

Anker

USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors

Confidence

78%

PossibleCopper conductor corrosion and oxidation

PossibleThermal degradation of PVC jacket

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from jacket wear

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Microplastic shedding from nylon jacket degradation and Electrical safety from insulation breakdown on the Anker and not on the Anker.
  • We flag Copper conductor corrosion and oxidation, Thermal degradation of PVC jacket and Microplastic shedding from jacket wear on the Anker and not on the Anker.
  • The Anker is Nylon cable with standard connectors where the Anker is PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof personal electronics cases, see the full ranking