USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack vs Disney Waterproof Phone Pouch: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Anker
USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleCopper conductor corrosion and oxidation
PossibleThermal degradation of PVC jacket
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from jacket wear
Disney Waterproof Phone Pouch
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossiblePlasticizer leaching (phthalates, BPA)
PossibleMicroplastics from material wear
PossibleSeal degradation and bacterial/mold growth if wet
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Copper conductor corrosion and oxidation, Thermal degradation of PVC jacket and Microplastic shedding from jacket wear on the Anker and not on the .
- We flag Plasticizer leaching (phthalates, BPA), Microplastics from material wear and Seal degradation and bacterial/mold growth if wet on the and not on the Anker.
- The Anker is PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors where the is Plastic pouch, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof personal electronics cases, see the full ranking