USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack vs USB-C to USB-C Cable: which is safer?

Anker USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Anker USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack

Anker

USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors

Confidence

78%

PossibleCopper conductor corrosion and oxidation

PossibleThermal degradation of PVC jacket

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from jacket wear

Google USB-C to USB-C Cable

Google

USB-C to USB-C Cable

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 67/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Copper conductors, PVC or TPE jacket

Confidence

78%

PossiblePVC or TPE jacket degradation with age and mechanical stress

PossibleConductor corrosion if jacket is damaged and cable contacts moisture

ReportedCounterfeit or substandard copies with unsafe conductors

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Copper conductor corrosion and oxidation, Thermal degradation of PVC jacket and Microplastic shedding from jacket wear on the Anker and not on the Google.
  • We flag PVC or TPE jacket degradation with age and mechanical stress, Conductor corrosion if jacket is damaged and cable contacts moisture and Counterfeit or substandard copies with unsafe conductors on the Google and not on the Anker.
  • The Anker is PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors where the Google is Copper conductors, PVC or TPE jacket, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof personal electronics cases, see the full ranking