USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack vs Power Adapter for Google Nest Cam Battery: which is safer?
Power Adapter for Google Nest Cam Battery is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Anker
USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors
Confidence
78%
PossibleCopper conductor corrosion and oxidation
PossibleThermal degradation of PVC jacket
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from jacket wear
Our pick
Power Adapter for Google Nest Cam Battery
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Plastic connector/cable
Confidence
45%
PossibleElectrical contact corrosion
PossibleOverheating and thermal stress
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Copper conductor corrosion and oxidation, Thermal degradation of PVC jacket and Microplastic shedding from jacket wear on the Anker and not on the Google.
- We flag Electrical contact corrosion and Overheating and thermal stress on the Google and not on the Anker.
- The Anker is PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors where the Google is Plastic connector/cable, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Google grade, at 45% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof personal electronics cases, see the full ranking