USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack vs Replacement Micro USB Charger Cord for JBL Clip 3 2, JBL Flip 4: which is safer?

Replacement Micro USB Charger Cord for JBL Clip 3 2, JBL Flip 4 is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Anker USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack

Anker

USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors

Confidence

78%

PossibleCopper conductor corrosion and oxidation

PossibleThermal degradation of PVC jacket

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from jacket wear

Our pick

Replacement Micro USB Charger Cord for JBL Clip 3 2, JBL Flip 4

JBL

Replacement Micro USB Charger Cord for JBL Clip 3 2, JBL Flip 4

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Copper wire, PVC/TPE cable jacket

Confidence

72%

PossibleElectrical shock from damaged insulation

PossibleHeat buildup in damaged or defective cable

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Copper conductor corrosion and oxidation, Thermal degradation of PVC jacket and Microplastic shedding from jacket wear on the Anker and not on the JBL.
  • We flag Electrical shock from damaged insulation and Heat buildup in damaged or defective cable on the JBL and not on the Anker.
  • The Anker is PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors where the JBL is Copper wire, PVC/TPE cable jacket, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof personal electronics cases, see the full ranking