USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack vs Waterproof USB 2.0 Type C to Type A: which is safer?

L-com Waterproof USB 2.0 Type C to Type A is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Anker USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack

Anker

USB-C to USB-C Cable 2-Pack

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors

Confidence

78%

PossibleCopper conductor corrosion and oxidation

PossibleThermal degradation of PVC jacket

PossibleMicroplastic shedding from jacket wear

Our pick

L-com Waterproof USB 2.0 Type C to Type A

L-com

Waterproof USB 2.0 Type C to Type A

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

USB cable

Confidence

35%

PossibleConnector corrosion and water ingress

PossiblePVC/TPE jacket degradation

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Copper conductor corrosion and oxidation, Thermal degradation of PVC jacket and Microplastic shedding from jacket wear on the Anker and not on the L-com.
  • We flag Connector corrosion and water ingress and PVC/TPE jacket degradation on the L-com and not on the Anker.
  • The Anker is PVC outer jacket, copper conductors, standard connectors where the L-com is USB cable, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
  • We are less certain about the L-com grade, at 35% confidence against 78%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof personal electronics cases, see the full ranking