Even R1 Smart Ring vs Gen 2 Air Ultra-Thin Smart Ring: which is safer?
Even R1 Smart Ring is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Even Realities
Even R1 Smart Ring
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
titanium, stainless steel, sapphire crystal
Confidence
72%
PossibleBand material variability
PossibleSkin sensitization from sweat pooling
RingConn
Gen 2 Air Ultra-Thin Smart Ring
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Stainless steel, sapphire crystal
Confidence
45%
PossibleStainless steel corrosion and nickel release
PossibleSeal and gasket degradation
PossibleBattery leakage and electrolyte exposure
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Band material variability and Skin sensitization from sweat pooling on the Even Realities and not on the RingConn.
- We flag Stainless steel corrosion and nickel release, Seal and gasket degradation and Battery leakage and electrolyte exposure on the RingConn and not on the Even Realities.
- The Even Realities is titanium, stainless steel, sapphire crystal where the RingConn is Stainless steel, sapphire crystal, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the RingConn grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More water-resistant smart rings & bands, see the full ranking