Even R1 Smart Ring vs Gen 3 Smart Ring: which is safer?

Even R1 Smart Ring is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Even R1 Smart Ring

Even Realities

Even R1 Smart Ring

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 77/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

titanium, stainless steel, sapphire crystal

Confidence

72%

PossibleBand material variability

PossibleSkin sensitization from sweat pooling

RingConn Gen 3 Smart Ring

RingConn

Gen 3 Smart Ring

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Titanium, stainless steel, sapphire glass

Confidence

72%

PossibleNickel release from metal components

PossibleBacterial colonization in crevices and under band

PossibleCorrosion byproducts from degraded metal

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Band material variability and Skin sensitization from sweat pooling on the Even Realities and not on the RingConn.
  • We flag Nickel release from metal components, Bacterial colonization in crevices and under band and Corrosion byproducts from degraded metal on the RingConn and not on the Even Realities.
  • The Even Realities is titanium, stainless steel, sapphire crystal where the RingConn is Titanium, stainless steel, sapphire glass, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More water-resistant smart rings & bands, see the full ranking