Even R1 Smart Ring vs Smart Ring Gen 2: which is safer?
These two grade almost identically. Pick on price and preference; neither has a PFAS edge.
Even Realities
Even R1 Smart Ring
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
titanium, stainless steel, sapphire crystal
Confidence
72%
PossibleBand material variability
PossibleSkin sensitization from sweat pooling
RingConn
Smart Ring Gen 2
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 77/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Titanium alloy body
Confidence
35%
PossibleSeal degradation and water ingress
PossiblePolymer band or adhesive leachables (if rubber or silicone band used)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Band material variability and Skin sensitization from sweat pooling on the Even Realities and not on the RingConn.
- We flag Seal degradation and water ingress and Polymer band or adhesive leachables (if rubber or silicone band used) on the RingConn and not on the Even Realities.
- The Even Realities is titanium, stainless steel, sapphire crystal where the RingConn is Titanium alloy body, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the RingConn grade, at 35% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More water-resistant smart rings & bands, see the full ranking