Water Storage Treatment 2 oz Glass Bottles 60 gallons Purification vs 32 Oz Wells Plastic Filter Water Bottle with AUTOSPOUT Straw Lid - Direct Print: which is safer?
Aquamira Water Storage Treatment 2 oz Glass Bottles 60 gallons Purification edges it on pure PFAS risk, but Contigo 32 Oz Wells Plastic Filter Water Bottle with AUTOSPOUT Straw Lid - Direct Print wins overall once other hazards are counted.
Aquamira
Water Storage Treatment 2 oz Glass Bottles 60 gallons Purification
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleChemical overdose or misuse
ReportedDegradation and loss of efficacy over time
PossibleGlass bottle breakage and spillage
Our pick
Contigo
32 Oz Wells Plastic Filter Water Bottle with AUTOSPOUT Straw Lid - Direct Print
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleBacterial growth in filter and straw mechanism
PossiblePlastic leachates from body or lid (non-BPA)
PossibleCoating or ink degradation on direct-print design
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Chemical overdose or misuse, Degradation and loss of efficacy over time, Glass bottle breakage and spillage and Chlorine residue and taste/odor on the Aquamira and not on the Contigo.
- We flag Bacterial growth in filter and straw mechanism, Plastic leachates from body or lid (non-BPA), Coating or ink degradation on direct-print design and AUTOSPOUT straw seal failure on the Contigo and not on the Aquamira.
- The Aquamira is glass bottles, sodium dichloroisocyanurate treatment chemical where the Contigo is BPA-free plastic body, carbon-type filter, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are 5 points apart, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More water filters: see the full ranking