The Ultimate Wok vs Stainless Clad Fry Pan: which is safer?
Made In Stainless Clad Fry Pan is the clear pick. AROMA The Ultimate Wok carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Aroma
The Ultimate Wok
PFAS grade
Bad 15/100
Overall grade
Bad 0/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 4
Material
nonstick coating, type unspecified
Confidence
35%
PossibleTeflon-type coating fume risk (thermal decomposition)
ReportedCoating degradation and flaking
PossibleAluminum substrate leaching
Our pick
Made In
Stainless Clad Fry Pan
PFAS grade
Excellent 100/100
Overall grade
Excellent 96/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 1
Material
Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating
Confidence
90%
PossibleClad separation or delamination over time
Where these two actually differ
- We flag PTFE fume risk (thermal decomposition), Coating degradation and flaking, Aluminum substrate leaching and Lack of published safety testing or certification on the Aroma and not on the Made In.
- We flag Clad separation or delamination over time on the Made In and not on the Aroma.
- The Aroma is nonstick coating, type unspecified where the Made In is Stainless steel clad construction, no nonstick coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 85 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the Made In is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Aroma grade, at 35% confidence against 90%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More cookware, see the full ranking