Men's GT-1000 15 GTX vs Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes: which is safer?

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes is our pick: better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Asics Men's GT-1000 15 GTX

ASICS

Men's GT-1000 15 GTX

PFAS grade

Bad 20/100

Overall grade

Bad 4/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Mesh/synthetic upper with Gore-Tex waterproof membrane

Confidence

45%

PossibleAzo dyes and formaldehyde resins in synthetic textiles

PossibleSynthetic lining microfiber shedding and inhalation

PossibleGore-Tex membrane delamination releasing particles

Our pick

New Balance Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

New Balance

Women's Fresh Foam Arishi v4 Shoes

PFAS grade

Good 65/100

Overall grade

Good 57/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole

Confidence

72%

PossibleAzo dyes and color-based toxins

PossibleAntimony in polyester

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Azo dyes and formaldehyde resins in synthetic textiles, Synthetic lining microfiber shedding and inhalation, Gore-Tex membrane delamination releasing particles and Adhesive volatiles (VOC off-gassing) from sole-to-upper bonding on the ASICS and not on the New Balance.
  • We flag Azo dyes and color-based toxins and Antimony in polyester on the New Balance and not on the ASICS.
  • The ASICS is Mesh/synthetic upper with Gore-Tex waterproof membrane where the New Balance is Mesh upper, Fresh Foam midsole, rubber outsole, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the New Balance is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the ASICS grade, at 45% confidence against 72%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric: materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More running & athletic shoes: see the full ranking