Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner vs Curl Charisma Rice Amino + Shea Curl Defining Conditioner: which is safer?

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts

Confidence

72%

PossibleHeavy metals in plant-derived ingredients

PossibleFragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers

PossibleSilicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair

Briogeo Curl Charisma Rice Amino + Shea Curl Defining Conditioner

Briogeo

Curl Charisma Rice Amino + Shea Curl Defining Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 53/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Water-based conditioner; key actives are rice amino acids and shea butter

Confidence

78%

PossibleFormaldehyde releasers (preservative class)

PossibleFragrance allergen sensitivity

ReportedMicrobial growth if unmaintained

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Heavy metals in plant-derived ingredients, Fragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers and Silicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair on the Avalon Organics and not on the Briogeo.
  • We flag Formaldehyde releasers (preservative class), Fragrance allergen sensitivity, Microbial growth if unmaintained and Heavy metals in botanical extracts on the Briogeo and not on the Avalon Organics.
  • The Avalon Organics is Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts where the Briogeo is Water-based conditioner; key actives are rice amino acids and shea butter, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More conditioner, see the full ranking