Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner vs Density Conditioner: which is safer?
Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Avalon Organics
Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts
Confidence
72%
PossibleHeavy metals in plant-derived ingredients
PossibleFragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers
PossibleSilicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair
Briogeo
Density Conditioner
PFAS grade
Excellent 75/100
Overall grade
Good 67/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
water-based conditioner (surfactants, humectants, emollients)
Confidence
78%
PossibleFragrance allergens
PossiblePreservative sensitivity
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in plant-derived ingredients, Fragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers and Silicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair on the Avalon Organics and not on the Briogeo.
- We flag Fragrance allergens and Preservative sensitivity on the Briogeo and not on the Avalon Organics.
- The Avalon Organics is Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts where the Briogeo is water-based conditioner (surfactants, humectants, emollients), which is most of the difference in these two grades.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More conditioner, see the full ranking