Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner vs Anti-Frizz & Smooth Conditioner: which is safer?

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts

Confidence

72%

PossibleHeavy metals in plant-derived ingredients

PossibleFragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers

PossibleSilicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair

Dove Anti-Frizz & Smooth Conditioner

Dove

Anti-Frizz & Smooth Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous conditioner base (water, silicones, conditioning agents)

Confidence

72%

Possible1,4-dioxane (manufacturing byproduct)

PossibleFragrance allergens and undisclosed components

PossibleSilicone accumulation with repeated use

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Heavy metals in plant-derived ingredients, Fragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers and Silicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair on the Avalon Organics and not on the Dove.
  • We flag 1,4-dioxane (manufacturing byproduct), Fragrance allergens and undisclosed components and Silicone accumulation with repeated use on the Dove and not on the Avalon Organics.
  • The Avalon Organics is Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts where the Dove is aqueous conditioner base (water, silicones, conditioning agents), which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More conditioner, see the full ranking