Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner vs Sleek & Shine Conditioner 12 FL OZ: which is safer?
Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
Avalon Organics
Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleHeavy metals in plant-derived ingredients
PossibleFragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers
PossibleSilicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair
Garnier Fructis
Sleek & Shine Conditioner 12 FL OZ
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possible1,4-dioxane (contaminant)
PossibleFormaldehyde releasers (preservative systems)
ReportedFragrance allergens (undisclosed components)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Heavy metals in plant-derived ingredients, Fragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers and Silicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair on the Avalon Organics and not on the Garnier Fructis.
- We flag 1,4-dioxane (contaminant), Formaldehyde releasers (preservative systems) and Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components) on the Garnier Fructis and not on the Avalon Organics.
- The Avalon Organics is Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts where the Garnier Fructis is Water-based conditioner formulation, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More conditioner, see the full ranking