Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner vs Vons Fructis Conditioner: which is safer?

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.

Our pick

Avalon Organics

Biotin B-Complex Thickening Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Good 73/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts

Confidence

72%

PossibleHeavy metals in plant-derived ingredients

PossibleFragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers

PossibleSilicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair

Vons Fructis Conditioner

Garnier Fructis

Vons Fructis Conditioner

PFAS grade

Excellent 75/100

Overall grade

Good 63/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

aqueous conditioner base with botanical extracts

Confidence

75%

PossibleFragrance allergens and sensitizers

PossibleSilicone accumulation and scalp buildup

PossiblePreservative irritation (contact dermatitis)

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Heavy metals in plant-derived ingredients, Fragrance allergen or undisclosed sensitizers and Silicone or plastic microparticle buildup on hair on the Avalon Organics and not on the Garnier Fructis.
  • We flag Fragrance allergens and sensitizers, Silicone accumulation and scalp buildup and Preservative irritation (contact dermatitis) on the Garnier Fructis and not on the Avalon Organics.
  • The Avalon Organics is Water, conditioning agents, organic plant extracts where the Garnier Fructis is aqueous conditioner base with botanical extracts, which is most of the difference in these two grades.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More conditioner, see the full ranking