UV Haze 010 Filter vs Hero 13/12 11 10/9 Waterproof Housing Case: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
GoPro
Hero 13/12 11 10/9 Waterproof Housing Case
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 59/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Polycarbonate or acrylic plastic housing with waterproof seals
Confidence
42%
PossibleMicroplastic shedding from gasket wear
LikelyPFAS in waterproof gasket coatings
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Microplastic shedding from gasket wear and PFAS in waterproof gasket coatings on the GoPro and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the GoPro is Polycarbonate or acrylic plastic housing with waterproof seals, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the GoPro grade, at 42% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking