UV Haze 010 Filter vs Adventura Go SH 160 Bag: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Lowepro Adventura Go SH 160 Bag carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
Lowepro
Adventura Go SH 160 Bag
PFAS grade
Poor 40/100
Overall grade
Poor 26/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Nylon fabric with water-resistant coating
Confidence
45%
PossibleWater-resistant coating composition (PFAS or alternative)
ReportedCoating degradation and particle shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Water-resistant coating composition (PFAS or alternative) and Coating degradation and particle shedding on the Lowepro and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Lowepro is Nylon fabric with water-resistant coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Lowepro grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking