UV Haze 010 Filter vs SLR Camera 300mm Long Lens Deluxe Rain Cover Professional V2 Camouflage Woodland: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. SLR Camera 300mm Long Lens Deluxe Rain Cover Professional V2 Camouflage Woodland carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
SLR Camera 300mm Long Lens Deluxe Rain Cover Professional V2 Camouflage Woodland
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and microfiber/particle release
PossibleVOC off-gassing from coating solvents
PossibleContact dermatitis or sensitization from coating residue
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR coating degradation and microfiber/particle release, VOC off-gassing from coating solvents and Contact dermatitis or sensitization from coating residue on the and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the is nylon or polyester fabric with water-repellent coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking