UV Haze 010 Filter vs SLR Camera 300mm Long Lens Deluxe Rain Cover Professional V2 Camouflage Woodland: which is safer?

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. SLR Camera 300mm Long Lens Deluxe Rain Cover Professional V2 Camouflage Woodland carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 85/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

none flagged

Material

Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces

Confidence

82%
SLR Camera 300mm Long Lens Deluxe Rain Cover Professional V2 Camouflage Woodland

SLR Camera 300mm Long Lens Deluxe Rain Cover Professional V2 Camouflage Woodland

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Poor 28/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

nylon or polyester fabric with water-repellent coating

Confidence

35%

Possiblewater-repellent coating degradation and microfiber/particle release

PossibleVOC off-gassing from coating solvents

PossibleContact dermatitis or sensitization from coating residue

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag DWR coating degradation and microfiber/particle release, VOC off-gassing from coating solvents and Contact dermatitis or sensitization from coating residue on the and not on the B+W.
  • The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the is nylon or polyester fabric with water-repellent coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking