UV Haze 010 Filter vs Small Waterproof Universal Matin Neoprene Soft Video Camera Lens Pouch Bag Case For Canon Nikon Sony: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Small Waterproof Universal Matin Neoprene Soft Video Camera Lens Pouch Bag Case For Canon Nikon Sony carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Matin
Small Waterproof Universal Matin Neoprene Soft Video Camera Lens Pouch Bag Case For Canon Nikon Sony
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleUndisclosed waterproof coating (possible PFAS or polyurethane)
ReportedCoating degradation and particle shedding
PossibleOff-gassing of volatile solvents (fresh product)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Undisclosed waterproof coating (possible PFAS or polyurethane), Coating degradation and particle shedding, Off-gassing of volatile solvents (fresh product) and Skin sensitization from coating residue (if direct contact occurs) on the Matin and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Matin is Neoprene with unspecified waterproof coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Matin grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking