UV Haze 010 Filter vs Uusi SML XL Matin neopreenipehmeä kamerakotelo objektiivilaukkukotelo Canon Nikon Sony -kameralle: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Uusi SML XL Matin neopreenipehmeä kamerakotelo objektiivilaukkukotelo Canon Nikon Sony -kameralle carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
Matin
Uusi SML XL Matin neopreenipehmeä kamerakotelo objektiivilaukkukotelo Canon Nikon Sony -kameralle
PFAS grade
Overall grade
Verdict
Hazard flags
Material
Confidence
PossibleUndisclosed waterproof coating chemistry (potential PFAS or other fluorinated compounds)
PossibleNeoprene degradation and microparticle shedding
PossibleAdhesive or foaming agent residuals (volatile organic compounds)
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Undisclosed waterproof coating chemistry (potential PFAS or other fluorinated compounds), Neoprene degradation and microparticle shedding, Adhesive or foaming agent residuals (volatile organic compounds) and Bacterial or fungal growth if moisture trapped on the Matin and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Matin is Neoprene with unspecified waterproof coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Matin grade, at 42% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking