UV Haze 010 Filter vs WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is our pick, better on PFAS and on the overall hazard picture.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
Nikon
WP-CP3 Marine Case for Camera
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Good 73/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
⚑ 3
Material
Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals
Confidence
45%
PossiblePolycarbonate degradation over time
PossibleRubber gasket hardening and seal failure
PossibleMicrobial growth in sealed moisture pockets
Where these two actually differ
- We flag Polycarbonate degradation over time, Rubber gasket hardening and seal failure and Microbial growth in sealed moisture pockets on the Nikon and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Nikon is Polycarbonate/rubber with waterproof seals, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- These two are level, close enough that price and fit should decide it rather than our grade.
- We are less certain about the Nikon grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking