UV Haze 010 Filter vs Photo-video 1 Model 5201 Strong Polytek Waterproof Bag: which is safer?

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Tamrac Photo-video 1 Model 5201 Strong Polytek Waterproof Bag carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 85/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

none flagged

Material

Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces

Confidence

82%
Tamrac Photo-video 1 Model 5201 Strong Polytek Waterproof Bag

Tamrac

Photo-video 1 Model 5201 Strong Polytek Waterproof Bag

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Poor 28/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 3

Material

Polytek polyester with waterproof coating, unspecified

Confidence

45%

PossiblePFAS in waterproof coating (not separately graded)

PossiblePolyester microfiber shedding from coating wear

PossibleCoating degradation and leachate release

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag PFAS in waterproof coating (not separately graded), Polyester microfiber shedding from coating wear and Coating degradation and leachate release on the Tamrac and not on the B+W.
  • The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Tamrac is Polytek polyester with waterproof coating, unspecified, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Tamrac grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking