UV Haze 010 Filter vs Think Tank Emergency Rain Cover: which is safer?

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Think Tank Emergency Rain Cover carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 85/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

none flagged

Material

Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces

Confidence

82%
Think Tank Emergency Rain Cover

Think Tank Photo

Think Tank Emergency Rain Cover

PFAS grade

Poor 40/100

Overall grade

Bad 24/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 4

Material

Nylon ripstop with waterproof coating, composition unspecified

Confidence

45%

PossibleUnspecified waterproof coating chemistry

PossibleVolatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

PossibleCoating degradation and microparticle release

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Unspecified waterproof coating chemistry, Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing, Coating degradation and microparticle release and Mildew and bacterial growth (maintenance failure) on the Think Tank Photo and not on the B+W.
  • The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Think Tank Photo is Nylon ripstop with waterproof coating, composition unspecified, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
  • We are less certain about the Think Tank Photo grade, at 45% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking