UV Haze 010 Filter vs Think Tank Hydrophobia DM 300-600 Rain Cover: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Think Tank Hydrophobia DM 300-600 Rain Cover carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
Think Tank Photo
Think Tank Hydrophobia DM 300-600 Rain Cover
PFAS grade
Poor 40/100
Overall grade
Poor 32/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Polyester/nylon with water-repellent water-repellent coating
Confidence
42%
Possiblewater-repellent coating leachables (PFAS status unknown)
PossibleCoating degradation over time
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR coating leachables (PFAS status unknown) and Coating degradation over time on the Think Tank Photo and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Think Tank Photo is Polyester/nylon with water-repellent DWR coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Think Tank Photo grade, at 42% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking