UV Haze 010 Filter vs Cross 11L Sling Bag: which is safer?
B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Think Tank PhotoCross 11L Sling Bag carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.
Our pick
B+W
UV Haze 010 Filter
PFAS grade
Excellent 85/100
Overall grade
Excellent 85/100
Verdict
Buy
Hazard flags
none flagged
Material
Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces
Confidence
82%
Think Tank Photo
Cross 11L Sling Bag
PFAS grade
Poor 40/100
Overall grade
Bad 18/100
Verdict
Skip
Hazard flags
⚑ 2
Material
Ballistic nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating
Confidence
35%
Likelywater-repellent coating PFAS content
PossiblePolyamide fabric degradation and microfiber shedding
Where these two actually differ
- We flag DWR coating PFAS content and Polyamide fabric degradation and microfiber shedding on the Think Tank Photo and not on the B+W.
- The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Think Tank Photo is Ballistic nylon with DWR water-repellent coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
- The gap is 45 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.
- We are less certain about the Think Tank Photo grade, at 35% confidence against 82%, because it discloses less.
Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →
More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking