UV Haze 010 Filter vs Series 9 Clear Standard Coated Filter S9CLR: which is safer?

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter is the clear pick. Tiffen Series 9 Clear Standard Coated Filter S9CLR carries a failing PFAS grade, and we never recommend buying a failing product.

Our pick

B+W UV Haze 010 Filter

B+W

UV Haze 010 Filter

PFAS grade

Excellent 85/100

Overall grade

Excellent 85/100

Verdict

Buy

Hazard flags

none flagged

Material

Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces

Confidence

82%
Tiffen Series 9 Clear Standard Coated Filter S9CLR

Tiffen

Series 9 Clear Standard Coated Filter S9CLR

PFAS grade

Good 50/100

Overall grade

Poor 42/100

Verdict

Skip

Hazard flags

⚑ 2

Material

Glass optics with standard optical coating

Confidence

72%

PossibleOptical coating delamination or scratching

PossibleFragmentation hazard if dropped

Where these two actually differ

  • We flag Optical coating delamination or scratching and Fragmentation hazard if dropped on the Tiffen and not on the B+W.
  • The B+W is Optical glass lens with multi-coated optical surfaces where the Tiffen is Glass optics with standard optical coating, which is most of the difference in these two grades.
  • The gap is 35 points, wide enough that this is not a close call, and the B+W is the one to buy.

Both products run through the same public rubric, which covers materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls, plus a beyond-PFAS hazard analysis. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab tests. How grades work →

More waterproof camera & lens protection cases, see the full ranking